Files
ottyl/tickets/077-log-queries-scan-full-index-instead-of-seeking-by-key-range.md
T

73 lines
3.7 KiB
Markdown

# 077 — Log queries scan the full index instead of seeking by key range
## Summary
Every log read — including polling reads that only want logs newer
than `since_sequence` — walks the *entire* retained log range and
filters with a closure, rather than seeking the `BTreeMap` directly to
the relevant key range. This is the read-path optimization the
`left-right`/sort-helper-index work never got around to: iterators
should narrow the underlying key range as far as the caller's bounds
allow, and accept range bounds as a parameter instead of scanning from
`Start`/`MetricBucketSplit` and filtering after the fact.
## Where
- `EngineSnapshot::logs_range` (`src/engine/snapshot/mod.rs:159-168`)
always ranges `IndexKey::Start..IndexKey::LogParamSplit` — i.e. every
ingested log ever retained — with no way for a caller to pass a
narrower bound.
- `EngineSnapshot::logs_since` (`src/engine/snapshot/mod.rs:170-181`)
calls `logs_range()` and then filters by `sequence < before_sequence`
and a timestamp window in a closure — it has all the information
needed to seek instead (`before_sequence` bounds `sequence`
directly), but throws that away and scans linearly regardless of how
small the actual window is.
- The unsorted log-query path in `handle_query_inner`
(`src/engine/snapshot/query.rs:59-65`) does the same thing:
`snapshot.logs_range().filter(|(sequence, timestamp, _)| { since ...
start_ms ... end_ms ... })`. On every poll (frontend passes
`since_sequence` — see `webapp/src/lib/api.ts:263,343`), this walks
every previously-seen log line again just to throw it away in the
filter, before even getting to the new ones.
- `IndexKey::IngestedLog { sequence, timestamp }`
(`src/engine/index_key.rs:10-13`) derives `Ord` field-order-first on
`sequence`, so a lower bound of
`IndexKey::IngestedLog { sequence: since + 1, timestamp: Timestamp::MIN }`
(or equivalent) is a valid, correct seek — sequence is assigned
monotonically at ingest (`src/engine/handle.rs:118-119`), so this
isn't a heuristic, it's exact.
## Scope
- Change `logs_range` to accept a key range (e.g.
`RangeBounds<IndexKey>` or a `(Bound<u64>, Bound<u64>)` over
sequence) instead of hardcoding `Start..LogParamSplit`, so callers
can seek.
- Rework `logs_since` and the `EngineQuery::Logs` handler in
`query.rs:59-65` to build a lower bound from `since_sequence` (and,
where possible, from `start_ms`/note below) and pass it through,
instead of filtering post-hoc from the very start of the index.
- Note: because `IngestedLog` keys sort by `(sequence, timestamp)` and
not `(timestamp, sequence)`, a `start_ms`/`end_ms`-only query (no
`since_sequence`) can't be turned into an exact key-range seek from
this index alone even though ingestion is roughly time-ordered by
sequence — call this out explicitly rather than seeking incorrectly;
it may be acceptable to leave that case as a scan, or to binary-search
for the first sequence at/after `start_ms` since timestamps are
non-decreasing with sequence in practice.
- The sorted branch (`query.rs:82-128`) iterates `sort_helper_index`
directly rather than `logs_range`, so it's less affected, but still
does a per-candidate `index.get()` (`query.rs:106-107`) with no early
bound — check whether the helper index itself can be range-bounded
once `since_sequence`/`start_ms` are known.
- Add/extend a test asserting that a `since_sequence` poll on a large
log store does not touch (or does not compare against) log entries
at or before `since_sequence` — a range-based seek should make this
observably true, not just faster.
## Depends on
None. Related to ticket 060/061 (sort helper indexes) — same
underlying principle (avoid full scans by indexing/seeking).